| Filter settings |
| Results | |
|---|---|
| Number of records in this query: | 10 |
| Total records in survey: | 10 |
| Percentage of total: | 100.00% |
| Field summary for League | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sixty three percent voted to keep the league size at 12 teams. Fifty four percent voted to keep our current 3 divisions. Eighty one percent voted for a 2 conference league.So this question will address how to organize the league. We will have to either change to a 2 or 4 division league to have the 2 conferences. Or we just continue with the current 3 divisions. Please choose one of the following 3 choices. | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| 2 divisions - 2 conferences (basically each division would be a conference) (2) | 5 | 50.00% | |
| Keep the 3 division as they are currently (3) | 3 | 30.00% | |
| 4 divisions - 2 conferences - (2 divisions of 3 in each conference) (4) | 2 | 20.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for keeper | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The vote on the keeper league is very close. 3 voted yes. 5 voted no. 3 did not complete the answer. So I will do one more vote here and majority wins. Of those who voted yes the majority was to keep 4 players for the next year. The majority voted to have a trade deadline of week 10 whether we have a keeper league or not so that will remain the same. The majority also voted to clear rosters and start next year as a keeper league. So here is the question. Do we change to a keeper league, keep 4 players, have a week 10 trade deadline and clear rosters for next year? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Yes (Y) | 5 | 50.00% | |
| No (N) | 5 | 50.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for roster | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ten voted to keep a 16 man roster and eleven voted to keep the injured reserve. So this will remain as is. The next question is to determine who can play in flex. It was pretty unanimous that WR and RB can play in the flex postition. We had 6 votes to keep the QB and TE as flex positions. So I will ask one simple question to finalize.Which do you want for the flex position? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Quarterback/Running back/Wide Receiver/Tight End (QBTE) | 6 | 60.00% | |
| Running Back/Wide Receiver only (RBWR) | 4 | 40.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for trade approval | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Seventy two percent voted that trades should be approved by the majority of voters. One thing to keep in mind for this is that the 2 teams involved in the trade will already be voting yes for it will take at least 3 no votes to veto the trade.Should the the majority vote approve trades?If this proposal fails, the rule will remain as it is now and it will take 7 no votes to veto the trade. The commissioner will no longer take the responsibility of determining whether a trade is fair or not. | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Yes (Y) | 8 | 80.00% | |
| No (N) | 2 | 20.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for passing | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mostly everyone voted to leave the passing yards as is. A few comments were made to changing the point structure for yardage so I give you the choice here.Which passing yards do you want? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| 1 pt for every 25 yards passing (25) | 7 | 70.00% | |
| 1 pt for every 50 yards passing (This is the current rule) (50) | 3 | 30.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for rushing | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| All receiving and rushing pts for TD's and 2 pt conversion and fumbles lost will remain as is. I will make sure the quarterback is included in the rushing yardage scoring. Looking at the surveys it looks like we need to change the all-purpose yards to yards from scrimmage and change the return yards. Scrimmage yards only include yards rushing and receiving and not return yards.Please choose from the following 2 options? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| 1 pt per 10 scrimmage yards and 1 pt per 25 return yards (25) | 6 | 60.00% | |
| 1 pt per 10 scrimmage yards and 1 pt per 50 return yards (50) | 4 | 40.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for kicking | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| The only change proposed for kicking is for missed FG and XP.Should kickers get minus 1 point for each missed kick? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Yes (Y) | 6 | 60.00% | |
| No (N) | 4 | 40.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Field summary for schedule | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| It was a unanimous vote to keep the seeding format as is. This may have to be tweaked if we change the number of divisions. We will seed the division winners as the top seeds and place the others according to rank. The last question has to do with 13 vs 14 week regular season schedule. This is very close so we will have one final vote.On which week should our regular season end? | |||
| Answer | Count | Percentage | |
| Week 13 (13) | 7 | 70.00% | |
| Week 14 (14) | 3 | 30.00% | |
| No answer | 0 | 0.00% | |
| Non completed | 0 | 0.00% | |
